IPv4
From $0.70 for 1 pc. 41 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
IPv4
From $0.70 for 1 pc. 41 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
IPv4
From $0.70 for 1 pc. 41 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
IPv6
From $0.07 for 1 pc. 14 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
ISP
From $1.35 for 1 pc. 23 countries to choose from, rental period from 7 days.
Mobile
From $14 for 1 pc. 14 countries to choose from, rental period from 2 days.
Resident
From $0.90 for 1 GB. 200+ countries to choose from, rental period from 30 days.
Use cases:
Use cases:
Tools:
Company:
About Us:
Different types of anonymous intermediary servers are tailored to address specific requirements. An individual may interact with that type of server in the following ways: as CGI proxy based solutions that are accessible through web forms; software-based methods installed on the Operating System or Application level; or as plugins associated with a particular web browser.
We can refer to a computer generated imagery solution as a middleman that splits the user from the target site by putting a server-side application between the two.
It is important to note how to start using CGI proxy, its structure, use cases, advantages, and disadvantages before making a decision on whether it is the right fit for your requirements.
CGI means Common Gateway Interface which speaks of an industry standard that regulates the exchange of information between a web server and a script or app. This type of web-based solution has been defined as web-based solutions that grant permissions for internet pages using a web form. It is also referred to as an “anonymizer” because the primary work of such proxies is to hide the address of the client.
It's easy to understand why this term has been selected as it describes the main idea of CGI-based solutions as maintaining privacy. A user simply goes to the tool’s website, and the user is prompted to input a specific target URL into the appropriate box. The server makes a request on the users’ behalf, retrieves the information, and showcases it back on the browser.
This flow is reliant on two main elements of computer generated imagery: web form for filling out information, and a script for handling functions. The form gathers the input that is going to be sent, and the script, which is often written in some PHP or Perl, is automated to fetch the request and send out the properties of engagement.
But, it should be pointed out that in most cases, these tools only work with HTTP and HTTPS servers – leaving out advanced ones such as SOCKS5 – which makes them less efficient in some cases. On the other hand, they serve well for basic web browsing. All of the differences in protocols and their uses can be found here.
This set of tools has a specific design comprising two layers: the top layer is responsible for the interface and the under layer is the server-side logic. Both layers work together to enable users to access the web through a browser.
These are programs that control the communication flow between the user and the targeted site. They are the most important part of the system, and they are responsible for all the routing logic. In other words, they are the engine of the anonymizing mechanism.
This refers to the interface displayed to the user; it is usually an HTML form where a user inputs a target URL. Most of the time, the interface is programmed in PHP or Perl, and it sends the input data to the backend script using either the GET or POST method.
The interaction between users and scripts is handled by the Weblet shell.
In some implementations, the user-facing form is more advanced and offers options beyond URL input. Other forms of input could be:
Such features make form-based proxies more adaptable to bypass any sort of access restrictions.
For the CGI proxy dataset to work correctly, the interface and the handling script have to mesh seamlessly. If one part breaks down, the entire system cannot be expected to function normally.
The best way to identify and note the distinguishing aspects of an access point is through comparison with other types of tools.
Examples of locally installed tools are Proxifier, Fiddler, ProxyCap, and FreeCap. These can either work on the entire system or be set for specific individual programs. The level of precision and control provided is unmatched. Users can specify the exact applications that will use direct access as well as those that will be rerouted through the tool. This method works best for intricate sorts of workflows such as scraping or integrating APIs.
These are lightweight tools added to browsers such as Chrome and Firefox etc. For example, users can alter their IP address with a single click, set a different configuration for each website, or use IP pools without modifying traffic from other software.
In contrast to the previously discussed methods, when working with CGI proxy it requires no installation or configuration. Still, there is a tradeoff – their flexibility is greatly reduced. In other words, they cannot reroute traffic from and to non-browser interfaces, do not allow authentication or SOCKS5, and have limited control.
Using CGI based solutions does not require technical skills, which is ideal for those that wish to browse privately every once in a while. The process is as follows:
Important: Do not enter sensitive information such as username and passwords in CGI forms. Not all these tools will provide the necessary level of security with private data. For adequate confidentiality, it is best to buy a proxy server and set it at the software or browser level. This approach provides risk mitigation and improved performance.
These tools can be helpful in cases that require immediate and effortless access, especially in the absence of more advanced tools or services. Typical use cases include:
Most free anonymizers do not require registration – an aspect that increases their overall appeal. However, for better performance, paid services with browser or software integration are recommended considering the reliability, speed, and protection they provide.
Now, let’s dive into the advantages and disadvantages of using these web-based services.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
To sum it up, situations where accessibility takes precedence over masked identity best fit web anonymizers. For other advanced requirements such as monitoring accounts, automated task management, or providing security during sensitive sessions, isolated paid tools are recommended.